o – A light of hope in the dark: sustainability as the only path to social and environmental well-being. Reality is undoubtedly more complex now than it was 50 years ago; even more so if compared to a more distant past. This makes generalizations difficult, even though they seem to be ubiquitous these days.
WHEN GIANTS AWAKEN
by Paula Piaggi
Time to read
5 min
WHEN GIANTS AWAKEN
by Paula Piaggi
Time to read
5 min
WHEN GIANTS AWAKEN by Paula Piaggio
A light of hope in the dark: sustainability as the only path to social and environmental well-being.
Reality is undoubtedly more complex now than it was 50 years ago; even more so if compared
to a more distant past. This makes generalizations difficult, even though they seem to be ubiquitous
these days. There are, however, certain general currents that are present in every society and every
aspect of the current system, whether economic, productive, cultural or social. This is a clear
indication that our world is a habitat shared by all, and is now more interconnected than ever. Even
though events may take place away from our homes, their consequences will sooner or later knock on
our door.
Two opposing currents exist in the power play for global supremacy. One of these currents
tries to be aware of reality and its problems, and seeks to regard them holistically in order to try and
do something about them. The other current, when faced with a complex scenario, simply decides to
deny all the difficulties and problems generated by modern systems, and chooses instead to hold on
to a notion of wellbeing without change. In order to do that, this current resorts to the belief or hope
that lives in most of us that this tragic destiny will be avoided; accordingly, change –which is always
difficult and painful- will simply not be necessary. On the other hand, if predictions prove to be
accurate, humankind is the maker of its own problems, and that responsibility is not easy to admit.
The existence of these two currents does not mean that the players involved remain unchanged. In
fact, we have recently witnessed such a change, as right-wing parties rose to power in a number of
nations, thus changing the balance of power. The best-known example of this change is the U.S., but it
is not the only one. Donald Trump and accordingly the U.S. are at the top of the list of climate change
negationist nations, who deliberately choose to ignore all evidence of climate change or
environmental problems related to modern forms of production and consumerism. The question is:
why is this way of thinking so politically profitable in so many countries? If sustainability is
understood as a balance among the economy, the environment and social equality, and if we consider
that the wealth distribution gap keeps getting wider in most western nations, it is not hard to
understand why the notion of sustainability is not only complex and uncomfortable, but also
dangerous to a number of powerful sectors. The lack of social equality and the related salary gaps
lead to a fall in the standard of living of millions and their access to cultural assets. This is clearly
beneficial to certain sectors that do not want to see the status quo change, and who fail to understand
that the world they are destroying is the same world where they, their children and grandchildren now
live and will continue to live. As a result, even though it is easy to make people believe that
sustainability is not a need but a luxury, reality will eventually tear the mask and the damages to our
habitat will become apparent. The hard facts and the voices calling for a change will be so numerous
and strong, that they will no longer be disregarded as a mere fashion. While fashion is often seen as
frivolous and fleeting, it does have profound meaning. Fashion’s negative connotations are only
associated with its more immediate manifestations in a given context. Fashion, however, does have
profound and lasting meaning, as it reflects and communicates a society’s views at any given time.
Sustainability as a fashion is not about something superficial: it communicates a collective need for
respect, responsibility and empathy towards the environment.
Hope is the last thing to die, and other nations are already moving in the opposite direction as
the U.S., thus rearranging the balance of power, generating new playing fields and strategies. China
–the most populated nation and the biggest producer in the world- has recently changed its
environmental policies, by taking direct public policy steps in this area. While these are just the first
steps, they are taking China in the right direction. Until a few years ago, because of its demography
and economic policies, China was one of the most adamant climate change negationists and one of
the most polluting nations in the world. It was the nation to face, because of its unbridled use and
abuse of natural resources. Those policies eventually led to China’s current reality. The consequences
of those decisions are now very real and brutal. The past cannot be changed though, and only the
present lies within our power. For better or for worse, those policies have created a society that is now
on the path towards responsible consumption. After all, when all the predictions that initially sounded
like mere cataclysmic threats by some wildly imaginative scientists suddenly come true, denial
ceases to be an option. When the air becomes unbreathable, the water undrinkable and the sun a
distant memory, it is hard to make people believe that sustainability is just a luxury product for young
millennials to feel good about themselves.
This awakening is not explained solely by the extreme consequences of pollution that are now
being experienced by people in China. It makes part of a context of rising standards of living, greater
access to education, and increasing purchase power. During the first years of the industrial revolution,
China and its people were merely regarded as a source of labor to be exploited. As global markets
became saturated, and after many years of sustained economic growth, Chinese and global
companies started to look to the domestic Chinese market, which they had previously neglected.
Today, experts believe that China has the largest number of middle-class inhabitants, ahead of
Europe, the United States and Japan (all regions where middle class numbers are dwindling). In a
growth-based global economic system, where new markets are increasingly harder to find, the
creation of a new market as large as China cannot possibly be ignored. If Chinese people start to
demand certain production standards, social and environmental responsibility conditions, the strength
of their demands will be greater, and so will the losses if those demands are not satisfied.
In other regions of the world, where awareness about responsible and sustainable
consumption has been developing for a longer period of time, sustainability continues to be regarded
as something that adds value to goods and services and boosts their prices, and as a feature to be
highlighted when marketing those goods and services. Those who can pay premium prices, in
addition to getting the relevant goods or services, acquire also the right to feel morally superior. By
buying those kinds of products, we become responsible, committed consumers, and wash off the
guilt about all the things we have not changed or done before: this is the view of sustainability that a
number of powerful players seem interested in establishing among the general public. The case of
China -because of how rapidly they destroyed their environment and because of the potentially huge
role they can play in turning things around- should serve as an example for us to understand that
sustainable living is not a fad, is not about washing off guilt, and is not an “optional” path to be taken
by those who can afford it. Sooner or later, large-scale sustainable living will be the only path into a
future that is no longer bleak.
We need to understand that each of us has the power to change things. It is our responsibility
to demand change, as our voices, when added to millions of other voices around the world, will not be
lost -rather, they will become more powerful and relevant. Every action counts. That is why we need to
embrace our share of responsibility as members of this voracious system; we need to become
proactive agents of choice and change, as users or producers, as inhabitants of this planet.
Sustainability is a very complex matter, as it involves substantive, deep structural changes.
There are no certainties when it comes to sustainability, and we need to learn as we go. We are bound
to encounter closed roads, numerous detours, darkness and obstacles. That is why we need certain
basic notions to light the way. Economic, social and environmental systems are not separate and
interdependent: they are integrated systems that cannot be separately understood. There can be no
economic growth to the detriment of the environment or people’s standard of living. We need to
understand that production scale must necessarily be linked to a community’s ability to control the
related environmental and cultural benefits and damages; it must also be linked to the ecosystem
where it takes place, thus creating a two-way relationship for the benefit of both parties.
The giant seems to be awakening and joining the sustainability currents that now exist
elsewhere in the world. The giant is awakening at a time when change is not only necessary but also
urgent. Urgency brings about change; it brings people together and makes them stronger. When that
urgency exists in the most populated nation in the world, change becomes a powerful, unstoppable
force. It is crucial that we learn from China’s experience, rather than wait until irreversible pollution
reaches our doorstep. As citizens of the world, we must do all we can to contribute to the
sustainability current and continue to innovate and develop technologies designed to maximize
sustainability, not as a value-added feature or as a luxury product, but as a production standard for all
goods and services, thus turning mass, homogeneous and slave production into a luxury that no
society can afford. Production costs should not be increased by recycling, circular design or fair trade;
they should be increased by the carbon footprint and by destructive practices such as fast fashion.
After all, we are already paying the price of those practices with our lives.
Change is possible. A part of the world is awake and they will not go back to sleep. Together,
we can change the way how we relate to our world, by learning to share it and take care of it. We need
to make others understand that change may be scary, but it is also full of new possibilities for a better
life and a better future. The giant has awakened and will not go back to sleep.
Paula Piaggio
Buenos Aires, April 2019